[jsweep] Clean close_discussion.cjs#13292
Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Closed
Conversation
- Simplified discussion number extraction with ternary operators - Optimized label validation using Set for O(1) lookup - Used nullish coalescing (??) and object property shorthand - Removed unnecessary intermediate variables - Created comprehensive test suite with 15 test cases - All validation checks passed (format, lint, typecheck, tests)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Cleaned and modernized
close_discussion.cjsby removing unnecessary code, optimizing performance, and adding comprehensive test coverage.Context
This file runs in github-script context with access to
github,core, andcontextglobals.Changes Made
Code Improvements
const item = messageassignmentSetinstead ofarray.includes()for O(1) lookup performance (previously O(n))??) forreasonparameter instead of logical ORcommentUrlreturn valueclosedDiscussionvariable and useddiscussion.urldirectlyTest Coverage
Created comprehensive test suite with 15 test cases covering:
Validation Checks
All validation checks passed successfully:
npm run format:cjs- All files formatted correctlynpm run lint:cjs- No linting errorsnpm run typecheck- No type errorsnpm run test:js- 15/15 tests passed (100%)Impact